<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romanticizing Mary Jane Kelly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/</link>
	<description>Everything you know is wrong. -Weird Al Yankovic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>How do we know she&#039;s 25? If she lied about everything else, why not her age? It makes more sense from a victimology standpoint that she would be similar in age to the other victims and therefore that she lied.

If the romanticizing of Mary is largely based on her age, then maybe if we stopped saying she was 25, there would be less romanticizing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do we know she&#8217;s 25? If she lied about everything else, why not her age? It makes more sense from a victimology standpoint that she would be similar in age to the other victims and therefore that she lied.</p>
<p>If the romanticizing of Mary is largely based on her age, then maybe if we stopped saying she was 25, there would be less romanticizing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CS</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>CS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>The above candidate would have been in her mid 30s and we know from the reports that Mary Kelly was 25.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above candidate would have been in her mid 30s and we know from the reports that Mary Kelly was 25.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbcoop</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>dbcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>More examples of Mary Kelly romanticized?

http://www.scribd.com/doc/37259254/Something-About-Mary-Jane-Kelly
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38038218/The-Mary-Kelly-Bug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More examples of Mary Kelly romanticized?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/37259254/Something-About-Mary-Jane-Kelly" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/37259254/Something-About-Mary-Jane-Kelly</a><br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/38038218/The-Mary-Kelly-Bug" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/38038218/The-Mary-Kelly-Bug</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Ray, the trouble with this candidate and the link to the Royal Conspiracy Theory is that it&#039;s basically made up out of whole cloth. It all traces back to Stephen Knight&#039;s 1978 book, Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution, which has been pretty thoroughly discredited and this so-called Mary Kelly is a product of the same kettle of fish. Here&#039;s a link that might help: http://www.casebook.org/suspects/knight.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, the trouble with this candidate and the link to the Royal Conspiracy Theory is that it&#8217;s basically made up out of whole cloth. It all traces back to Stephen Knight&#8217;s 1978 book, Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution, which has been pretty thoroughly discredited and this so-called Mary Kelly is a product of the same kettle of fish. Here&#8217;s a link that might help: <a href="http://www.casebook.org/suspects/knight.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.casebook.org/suspects/knight.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>How many matches to witness testimony would suffice to qualify a candidate as the real Mary Kelly?
Here we have 2 women who state that their respective great or great great grandmother had a daughter who &quot;sang on the English stage&quot; and had a father John and that she disappears from the records after 1881. Census records substantiate their claims and show that she had a brother Henry and a sister who was a merchant....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many matches to witness testimony would suffice to qualify a candidate as the real Mary Kelly?<br />
Here we have 2 women who state that their respective great or great great grandmother had a daughter who &#8220;sang on the English stage&#8221; and had a father John and that she disappears from the records after 1881. Census records substantiate their claims and show that she had a brother Henry and a sister who was a merchant&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>All are hoaxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All are hoaxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophia</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Do you mean the version of the Royal Conspiracy involving Prince Eddy and the cover-up of his affair and child with Annie Crook?
Or some other Royalty? Is Mary Kelly the subject of some renewed claims to the throne? From a different bloodline of France? 
Are they all hoaxes?
http://museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/forums/viewthread/6776/P22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean the version of the Royal Conspiracy involving Prince Eddy and the cover-up of his affair and child with Annie Crook?<br />
Or some other Royalty? Is Mary Kelly the subject of some renewed claims to the throne? From a different bloodline of France?<br />
Are they all hoaxes?<br />
<a href="http://museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/forums/viewthread/6776/P22" rel="nofollow">http://museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/forums/viewthread/6776/P22</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Burr,

If it were that easy, it would have been solved for centuries. We don&#039;t know who Mary Kelly was, or even if Mary Kelly was her real name. This bit shows up every now and again and is strongly linked to the Royal Conspiracy Theory.

Not the greatest source. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burr,</p>
<p>If it were that easy, it would have been solved for centuries. We don&#8217;t know who Mary Kelly was, or even if Mary Kelly was her real name. This bit shows up every now and again and is strongly linked to the Royal Conspiracy Theory.</p>
<p>Not the greatest source. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Can anyone verify this one? I think she&#039;s 30 with descendants from Glasgow and Winnipeg. You can find her by searching Mary Jane Kelly Descendants. http://www.topix.com/forum/ca/winnipeg-mb/TE53B2AQTJ4KEH4T7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone verify this one? I think she&#8217;s 30 with descendants from Glasgow and Winnipeg. You can find her by searching Mary Jane Kelly Descendants. <a href="http://www.topix.com/forum/ca/winnipeg-mb/TE53B2AQTJ4KEH4T7" rel="nofollow">http://www.topix.com/forum/ca/winnipeg-mb/TE53B2AQTJ4KEH4T7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Again, Harry... What do you base this on, other than your own personal speculation and broad generalizations. Nothing like this gets us any closer to the truth. Sorry. In fact, it actually muddies the waters quite a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, Harry&#8230; What do you base this on, other than your own personal speculation and broad generalizations. Nothing like this gets us any closer to the truth. Sorry. In fact, it actually muddies the waters quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry O</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 06:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Mary Kelly was probably in her 30s and not 25 since the Irish have baby-faces that make them appear younger. She likely had several children, all of whom would probably have emigrated to Australia or the Americas.

Publicity will improve the chances of the relatives, who may be doing online genealogy, to realize and come forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Kelly was probably in her 30s and not 25 since the Irish have baby-faces that make them appear younger. She likely had several children, all of whom would probably have emigrated to Australia or the Americas.</p>
<p>Publicity will improve the chances of the relatives, who may be doing online genealogy, to realize and come forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historyhype.com/2007/07/30/romanticizing-mary-jane-kelly/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Problem is, Harry, it&#039;s all just a lot of speculation and what ifs you&#039;re offering. Nothing verifiable. May be a hard truth to live with, but it&#039;s the truth just the same. We could all play guessing games and what if till the end of time and it&#039;d get us no closer to the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem is, Harry, it&#8217;s all just a lot of speculation and what ifs you&#8217;re offering. Nothing verifiable. May be a hard truth to live with, but it&#8217;s the truth just the same. We could all play guessing games and what if till the end of time and it&#8217;d get us no closer to the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

